<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brenner, R. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Parisky, Y.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Alternative breast-imaging approaches</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiol Clin North Am</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>45</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>907-23</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17888777</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17888777 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Generalized Least Significant Change for Individuals Measured on Different DXA Systems</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>In Press</VOLUME>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Generalized Least Significant Change for Individuals Measured on Different DXA Systems</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17616413</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17616413 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, L. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nishino, T. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Khamapirad, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grady, J. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Leonard, M. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brunder, D. G.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>52</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>4905-21</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17671343</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17671343 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Grady, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Vittinghoff, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lin, F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hanes, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ensrud, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Habel, L. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wallace, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Macer, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Effect of ultra-low-dose transdermal estradiol on breast density in postmenopausal women</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Menopause</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>14</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>391-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17224859</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17224859 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Tamimi, R. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byrne, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Colditz, G. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hankinson, S. E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>99</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1178-87</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17652278</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/blood/chemistry/*epidemiology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cohort</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confidence</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intervals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estradiol/*blood,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mamm</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17652278 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lazzari, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Belli, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gori, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosselli Del Turco, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Physical characteristics of five clinical systems for digital mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>34</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2730-43</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17821981</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17821981 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kotsuma, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tamaki, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nishimura, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tsubai, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ueda, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shimazu, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jin Kim, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miyoshi, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tanji, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Taguchi, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Noguchi, S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Breast</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17716895</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17716895 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gao, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Warren, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Warren-Forward, H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Forbes, J. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Breast Cancer Res Treat</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17616811</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17616811 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Zheng, D</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Huang, S</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zhou, H</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boone, J</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Simulation Studies On Contrast Enhanced Dual Energy Mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Medical Physics</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>34</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2606-2607 </PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kalkwarf, H. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zemel, B. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gilsanz, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lappe, J. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Horlick, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Oberfield, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mahboubi, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Frederick, M. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Winer, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS): Bone Mineral Content and Density According to Age, Sex and Race</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17311856</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<ABSTRACT>Context: Low bone mass may increase risk of fracture. Several chronic medical conditions, medications, and life style factors affect bone mineral accrual. Appropriate reference values are essential for identification of children with bone deficits. Objective: To establish reference curves for bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) in children. Design: The Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study (BMDCS) is an ongoing longitudinal study in which measurements are obtained annually. Setting: Five clinical centers in the U.S. Participants: 1554 healthy children (761 male, 793 female) ages 6-16 years of all ethnicies Intervention: none Main Outcome Measures: Scans of the total body, lumbar spine, hip and forearm were obtained using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Percentile curves based on 3 annual measurements were generated using the LMS statistical procedure. Results: BMC of the total body and lumbar spine, and BMD of the total body, lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and forearm are given for specific percentiles by sex, age and race (black vs. non-black). BMC and BMD were higher for blacks at all skeletal sites (p&lt;0.0001). BMC and BMD increased with age, and a plateau was not evident by age 16 (girls) or age 17 (boys). The variation in BMC and BMD also increased with age. Conclusions: Age, race and sex specific reference curves can be used to help identify children with bone deficits, and for monitoring changes in bone in response to chronic diseases or therapies.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES>0021-972X (Print)Journal article</NOTES>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17311856 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Bondy, M. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Newman, L. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Assessing breast cancer risk: evolution of the Gail Model</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>98</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1172-3</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16954464</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/epidemiology/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mathematical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Predictive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Value</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tests,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prognosi</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16954464 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kumar, A. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, D. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Au, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, Y. Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Leung, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Garwood, E. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gibbs, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hylton, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Esserman, L. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Biologic significance of false-positive magnetic resonance imaging enhancement in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Surg</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>192</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>520-4</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16978965</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>CD/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>CD34/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Differentiation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Myelomonocytic/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diseases/metabolism/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*metabolism/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intraductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Noninfiltrating/*metabolism/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16978965 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>McCormack, V. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>dos Santos Silva, I.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>15</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1159-69</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16775176</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*pathology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Menopause,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Time</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16775176 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lewiecki, E. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miller, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>17</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1303-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16823544</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16823544 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Herve, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Landau, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>33</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1490-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16752583</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16752583 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wilson, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hangartner, T. N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wilson, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hans, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Leib, E. S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>31-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16731429</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/instrumentation/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Societies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Medical</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16731429 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brandan, M. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ramirez, R. V.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>51</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2307-20</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16625044</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Algorithms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*instrumentation/methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Equipment</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Design,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Equipment</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Failure</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*instrumentation/methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement/*instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Interpretation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-As</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16625044 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Esserman, L. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kumar, A. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Herrera, A. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Leung, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Au, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, Y. Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Moore, D. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, D. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hellawell, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wolverton, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hwang, E. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hylton, N. M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Oncol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>24</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>4603-10</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17008702</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>CD/biosynthesis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>CD34/biosynthesis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antigens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Differentiation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Myelomonocytic/biosynthesis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*diagnosis/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intraductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Noninfiltrating/*diagnosis/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Immunohistochem</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17008702 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Barlow, W. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>White, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ballard-Barbash, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Vacek, P. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Titus-Ernstoff, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Carney, P. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tice, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Buist, D. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Geller, B. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosenberg, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yankaskas, B. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>98</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1204-14</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16954473</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/epidemiology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confounding</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>(Epidemiology),</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Incidence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Logistic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ag</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16954473 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Bennett, H. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Dienstfrey, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hudson, L. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Oreskovic, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Standards and Measurements for Assessing Bone Health-Workshop Report Co-Sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>399-405</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>17097524</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=17097524 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Leung, J. W. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density Compared with Visual Inspection by Radiologists: Inter- and Intraobserver Variability</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Vancouver, Canada</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<ABSTRACT>PURPOSE: Breast density is one of the strongest risk factors associated with increased breast cancer risk. Yet, there is no uniformly accepted clinical method of determining breast density. We measured the level of agreement in assessing breast density by visual inspection and correlation of visual inspection with an automated method using single x-ray absorptiometry (SXA).MATERIAL AND METHODS: The SXA method measures breast density by comparing extent of opacity present on mammograms to fat and glandular reference standards imaged with the craniocaudal breast view. SXA breast density (BD-SXA) is calculated using mathematical derivations previously described. We applied this automated technique to 286 consecutive film screen mammograms and then digitized the 286 screens to assess BI-RADS breast density. Blinded to BD-SXA results, 2 radiologists assigned BI-RADS density categories (1-fatty; 2-scattered fibroglandular densities; 3-heterogeneously dense; 4-extremely dense) to soft-copy digitized film screen on two separate occasions. The second reading occurred at least 1 month after the first reading. Radiologist A was a fellowship-trained mammographer with 7 years of experience. Radiologist B was a fourth-year radiology resident. A weighted kappa statistic was used to assess the variability in assigning BI-RADS categories between radiologists and within radiologists. Statistical significance was shown using 95% confidence interval (CI). Disagreement was considered to exist if there were any categorical differences between readings. Correlation between BI-RADS breast density category and BD-SXA was determined for each radiologist.RESULTS: Agreement between two radiologists using BI-RADS breast density was substantial (kappa 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.85). Agreement on repeat reading by the same radiologist using BI-RADS was less (kappa 0.67 for Radiologist A [95% CI: 0.59-0.75] and 0.53 [95% CI: 0.45-0.61] for Radiologist B) than agreement between radiologists. Correlation of BI-RADS assessment with BD-SXA (kappa-values of 0.47 [95% CI: 0.73-0.57] and 0.42 [95% CI: 0.33-0.51] for radiologist A and B, respectively) was moderate.CONCLUSION:There is moderate to substantial agreement in assigning BI-RADS breast density on screening mammography examinations. Correlation of BI-RADS and BD-SXA was modest. This suggests that BD-SXA is measuring breast density differently than a qualitative assessment. Future studies will examine whether BD-SXA is more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than BI-RADS breast density.&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;&Acirc;&not;_______________________________________________________________________KappaWeighted KappaIntraobserver variabilityJessica vs. Jessica0.530.67Jing vs. Jing0.310.53Interobserver variabilityJessica vs. Jing0.670.79Jessica vs. BD-SXA0.280.47Jing vs. BD-SXA0.220.420.59-0.750.45-0.610.72-0.850.37-0.570.33-0.51</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>van Engeland, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Snoeren, P. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Huisman, H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boetes, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Karssemeijer, N.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>25</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>273-82</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16524084</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16524084 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Creasman, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tice, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ziv, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>97</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>368-74</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15741573</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*etiology/*pathology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>California,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/etiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intraductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Noninfiltrating/etiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cross-Sectional</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15741573 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kappadath, S. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shaw, C. C.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>32</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>3395-408</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>16372415</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Algorithms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diseases/*diagnosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcification,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Physiologic,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Interpretation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=16372415 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gilsanz, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Horlick, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kalkwarf, H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lappe, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zemel, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fredrick, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Winer, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Forearm length measurement errors affect pediatric BMD</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>New Orleans, LA</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<ABSTRACT>Placement of the region of interest (ROI) for analysis of a standard forearm dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan requires a precise forearm length measurement, as placement of the ROI affects the bone mineral density (BMD) results of the scan. In longitudinal pediatric studies, this is potentially a major source of error because subjects are still growing. To determine if inaccuracy of forearm length measurement has an impact on the BMD results of the radius and to compare this to reference forearm growth rate, we studied forearm DXA scans from 1554 children, ages 6 to 16, (863 girls) who were enrolled in BMDCS at 5 clinical centers. Each subject had a baseline and a one year follow-up scan of the forearm on the Hologic Delphi. Forearm length measurements were obtained at each visit. We found that the cross-sectional growth rate in forearm length is similar between boys and girls, with a steady increase of about 9mm/year till age 10, after which the mean growth rate declines. The longitudinal change rate at 3 study sites followed a similar pattern as the cross-sectional changes. The remaining two sites showed one with significantly higher growth rate and the other with a negative growth rate. 34 of those scans were chosen for reanalysis after intentionally shortening the original forearm length by 10 mm. The change in BMD between the original and shortened length data was 0.9 and 1.5% for the mid and total radii, respectively (p&lt;0.05). These data demonstrate normal forearm lengths versus age and shows that measurements of BMD are clinically insensitive to minor errors in forearm length.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Meta, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Landau, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sherrer, Y. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Goddard, D. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ovalle, M. I.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosholm, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Metacarpal index and bone mineral density in healthy African-American women</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>16</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1621-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15947863</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*African</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Americans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density/*physiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Databases,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factual,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>European</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Continental</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ancestry</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Group,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Metacarpal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bones/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology/*physiology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15947863 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Herve, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Landau, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Novel use of Single X-Ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Technol Cancer Res Treat</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>4</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>173-82</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15773786</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15773786 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Melton, L. J., 3rd</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Looker, A. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O'Connor, M. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Achenbach, S. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Riggs, B. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Khosla, S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>16</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1558-64</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15812599</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone/etiology/physiopathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hip,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Lumbar</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Vertebrae,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Male,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis/*diagnosis/epidemiology/physiopathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Pelvis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prevalence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15812599 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Personal Communcation</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Manchester, England</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Schoeller, D. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tylavsky, F. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Baer, D. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chumlea, W. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Earthman, C. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Harris, T. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Heymsfield, S. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Horlick, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lohman, T. G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lukaski, H. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Siervogel, R. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Borrud, L. G.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>QDR 4500A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer underestimates fat mass in comparison with criterion methods in adults</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Clin Nutr</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>81</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1018-25</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15883424</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15883424 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Herve, L</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Margolin, F</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative Mammographic Absorptiometry to measure breast density in clinical practice</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Chicago, IL</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Herve, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Margolin, F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative Mammographic Absorptiometry to measure breast density in clinical practice</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Chicago, IL</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<ABSTRACT>Purpose: To determine if Quantitative Mammographic Absorptiometry (QMA), a novel automated method to measure volumetric compositional breast density that has been integrated into clinical care, is associated with standard breast cancer risk factors. Methods: Radiographic uniformity and calibration of attenuation to measure breast composition from standard mammograms is not known. We designed a calibration method that includes a correction algorithm, quality control and within-image reference phantom to automatically quantify breast density. The within-image reference phantom consists of two polymers atomically equivalent to adipose fat and breast fibroglandular materials. The phantom is being compressed and imaged with the screening craniocaudal views at California Pacific Medical Center Breast Health Center in San Francisco, CA. The reference phantom has been placed between compression surfaces. For small breasts, the two wedges slide away from each other to provide a thin reference at the thickness of the breast, while with large breasts, the wedges spring together for a thick reference. Comparing the attenuation of the reference materials to the breast pixels calibrates each breast pixel to % fibroglandular density. Summing all pixels in a mammogram results in a total percent fibroglandular density (BDQMA). Risk factor information isself-reported and collected on a survey with standardized questions created by the NIH-funded San Francisco Mammography Registry. We tested the association between BDQMA and age, family history of breast cancer, age at first live birth, menopause, postmenopausal hormone therapy and body massindex adjusting for age. Results: From April to December 2004, 1764 women had a BMQMA measure with 7% having a measure of &lt;10%, 33% of 10-25%, 41% of 26-50%, 17% of 51-75%, and 2% greater than 75%. We found strong relationships between BDQMA and age (P&lt; 0.001), current postmenopausalhormone therapy (P= 0.05), menopause (P&lt; 0.001), and body mass index (P&lt;0.001). BDQMA was not associated with age at first live birth or family history of breast cancer. Analyses measuring the association of BDQMA and breast cancer are underway. Conclusion: BDQMA is associated with characteristics that are known from previous work to be related to mammographic breast density, a strong predictor of breast cancer risk. This suggests BDQMA will be associated with breast cancer risk.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Binkley, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kiebzak, G. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lewiecki, E. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Krueger, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gangnon, R. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miller, P. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Drezner, M. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Bone Miner Res</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>20</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>195-201</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15647812</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bones/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Databases,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Femur/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Femur</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neck/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis/*diagnosis/*epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Postmenopause,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prevalence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Software,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Time</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15647812 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Toschke, J. O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Calcif Tissue Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>76</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>348-54</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15868279</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*instrumentation/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Forearm,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radius/metabolism/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Retrospective</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ulna/metabolism/*radiography</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15868279 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Toschke, J. O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2005</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Towards standardization of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the forearm: a common region of interest (ROI) improves the comparability among DXA devices</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Calcif Tissue Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>76</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>348-54</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15868279</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*instrumentation/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Forearm,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radius/metabolism/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Retrospective</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ulna/metabolism/*radiography</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>Manufacturer-implemented regions of interest (ROIs) to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) at the forearm are currently not standardized across dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) devices. We hypothesized that their differences introduce considerable variation in measurement results for forearm BMD when taken on different devices, and that a ROIs common to all devices with standardized placement and size significantly improve device comparability. The common ROI was defined to have a fixed length of 2 cm and to extend proximally from the location where the ulna and radius bones superimpose on the DXA image. The effects of universal standardization of forearm BMD were combined with and compared to those of the common ROI. They were drawn on 91 female study participants (ages 20-80 years, 10 per decade) who were scanned on Hologic QDR-4500, Aloka DCS-600EX, GE Lunar PIXI and Norland pDEXA DXA scanners. For all device combinations, manufacturer-implemented ROI root mean-square errors were significantly higher than for the common ROI, suggesting that implementing an ROI with common design on all scanners is a good way to reduce interdevice variability. When manufacturer-implemented ROIs were universally standardized root mean-square error (RMSE) values were less different from that of the nonstandardized Common ROI, suggesting that universal standardization can further improve interdevice comparability even when a common ROI such as the one implemented here is used. ROI standardization dramatically improves interdevice comparability.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES>0171-967X (Print)Comparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</NOTES>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15868279 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Least Significant Change in Bone Densitometry for Individuals Measured on Different Devices</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Hans, D.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>16th International Bone Densitometry Workshop</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Annecy, France</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Least Significant Change in Bone Densitometry for Individuals Measured on Different Devices</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Hans, D.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Annecy, France</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Ziv, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tice, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Smith-Bindman, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>13</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2090-5</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15598766</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*pathology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Predictive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Value</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tests,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Receptors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen/*analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Registries/*statistics</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>numerical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15598766 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Harvey, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative assessment of percent breast density: analog versus digital acquisition</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Technol Cancer Res Treat</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>3</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>611-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15560719</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Software</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15560719 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Klifa, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Carballido-Gamio, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wilmes, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Laprie, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lobo, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>DeMicco, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Watkins, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gibbs, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hylton, N.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantification of Breast Tissue Index from MR data using Fuzzy Clustering</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>3</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1667-1670</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Cuzick, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Warwick, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Pinney, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Warren, R. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Duffy, S. W.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2004</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>96</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>621-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15100340</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antineoplastic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hormonal/*administration</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>dosage,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Double-Blind</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Method,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Receptor</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Modulators/*administration</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>dosage</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15100340 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Pawluczyk, O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Augustine, B. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rico, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yang, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mawdsley, G. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>30</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>352-64</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12674236</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12674236</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fox, J. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>30</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12557971</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Computer</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Simulation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Three-Dimensional/instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Lumbar</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Vertebrae/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Biological,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Quality</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement/instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Scatter</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12557971 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Smith, R. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saslow, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sawyer, K. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Burke, W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Costanza, M. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Evans, W. P., 3rd</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Foster, R. S., Jr.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hendrick, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Eyre, H. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sener, S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>CA Cancer J Clin</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>53</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>141-69</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12809408</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*diagnosis/epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diagnostic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening/methods/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Physical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Examination,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12809408 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Rockhill, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byrne, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosner, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Louie, M. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Colditz, G.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Breast cancer risk prediction with a log-incidence model: evaluation of accuracy</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>56</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>856-61</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>14505770</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confidence</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intervals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Incidence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Logistic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Predictive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Value</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tests,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Assessment,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=14505770 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kappadath, S. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shaw, C. C.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>30</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1110-7</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12852535</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Algorithms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/complications/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcinosis/complications/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Energy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transfer,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhanceme</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12852535</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lewin, J. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Isaacs, P. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Vance, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Larke, F. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>229</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>261-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12888621</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Contrast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Media,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Feasibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Iohexol/*diagnostic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dua</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12888621 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Taibi, A</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fabbri, S</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>di Maggio, C</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gennaro, G</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Marziani, M</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tuffanelli, A</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gambaccini, M</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy imaging in full-field digital mammography: a phantom study</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>48</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1945-1956</PAGES>
	<URL>stacks.iop.org/PMB/48/1945</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Ziv, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Smith-Bindman, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>95</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>556-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12671024</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/pathology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*genetics/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confidence</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intervals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Medical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>History</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Taking,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Odds</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ratio,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Registries,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12671024 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zhao, S</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2003</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Statistical Methods for Quality Control and Quality Improvements and Their Applications in Radiology.</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Lu, Y</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Fang, J</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Advanced Medical Statistics</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Singpore</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>World Scientific Publisher</PUBLISHER>
	<PAGES>101-156</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Smith-Bindman, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: results of formal operator training</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1389-93</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12433716</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology/surgery,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/radiography/surgery,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>California,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Education,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Odds</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ratio,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiology/education,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistic</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12433716 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kuzmiak, C. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Millnamow, G. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Qaqish, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Pisano, E. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cole, E. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brown, M. E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Acad Radiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1378-82</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12553348</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Biopsy,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*diagnosis/epidemiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcinosis/diagnosis/epidemiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Infiltrating</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Duct/*diagnosis/epidemiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intraductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Noninfiltrating/*diagnosis/epidemiology/pathology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12553348</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Grigorian, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cheng, X. G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Toschke, J. O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Does osteoporosis classification using heel BMD agree across manufacturers?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>13</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>613-7</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12181618</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density/physiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcaneus,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/instrumentation/methods/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Linear</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis/classification/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging/statistics</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>numerical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reference</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>St</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12181618 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Sherman, M. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Frassetto, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Discrepancy in results between spine and hip scans of a woman with end stage renal disease</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>5</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>95-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11940734</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11940734 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Zhao, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wu, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Au, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Marquez, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shi, Z.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Determination of HER2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in archival breast carcinoma</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Mod Pathol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>15</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>657-65</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12065780</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/genetics/metabolism/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Immunohistochemistry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>In</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Situ</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hybridization/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>In</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Situ</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hybridization,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fluorescence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Receptor,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>erbB-2/analysis/*genetics</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12065780 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Mingin, G. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nguyen, H. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mathias, R. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Glidden, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Baskin, L. S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Growth and metabolic consequences of bladder augmentation in children with myelomeningocele and bladder exstrophy</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Pediatrics</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>110</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1193-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>12456918</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adolescent,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bicarbonates/*blood,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bladder</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Exstrophy/complications/metabolism/*surgery,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bladder,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neurogenic/etiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Height,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcium/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Child,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Child</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Development,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Chlorides/*blood,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Foll</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=12456918 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Dite, GS</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Stone, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gunasekara, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>English, DR</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>McCredie, MRE</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Giles, GG</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tritchler, D. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chiarelli, A</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hopper, JL</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>N Engl J Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>347</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>886-894</PAGES>
	<URL>www.nejm.org</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Smith-Bindman, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>223</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>554-7</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11997567</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cadaver,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*instrumentation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Feasibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Regression</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11997567 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Stone, M. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zhao, W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jacak, B. V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O'Connor, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yu, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rehak, P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>29</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>319-24</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11929014</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Electrons,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Glass,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Photons,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Selenium/*diagnostic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Sensitivity</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Specificity,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Time</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Rays</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11929014 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cheng, X. G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Toschke, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Engelke, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grigorian, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2002</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Bone Miner Res</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>17</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>734-45</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11918231</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11918231 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Hojo, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Akiyama, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nagasaki, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Maruyama, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kikuchi, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ikeda, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kitajima, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yamaguchi, K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Association of maspin expression with the malignancy grade and tumor vascularization in breast cancer tissues</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Lett</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>171</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>103-10</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11485832</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11485832</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saeed, I.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grigorian, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kendler, D. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>McClung, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Drake, W. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Ultrasound Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>27</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1337-45</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11731047</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Anthropometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bones/*ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fingers/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Metatarsus/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis/*physiopathology/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Physics,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radius/ultrasonography</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11731047 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Konez, O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Goyal, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Reaven, R. E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Can tamoxifen cause a significant mammographic density change in breast parenchyma?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Clin Imaging</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>25</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>303-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11682285</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antineoplastic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hormonal/*pharmacology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography/surgery,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tamoxifen/*pharmacology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11682285 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zhao, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mathur, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Classification of osteoporosis based on bone mineral densities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Bone Miner Res</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>16</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>901-10</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11341335</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hip</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures/physiopathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis/*classification/*physiopathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Spinal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures/physiopathology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11341335 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Maass, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Teffner, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosel, F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Pawaresch, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jonat, W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nagasaki, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rudolph, P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Decline in the expression of the serine proteinase inhibitor maspin is associated with tumour progression in ductal carcinomas of the breast</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Pathol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>195</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>321-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11673829</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11673829</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grigorian, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saeed, I.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluation of a gel-coupled quantitative ultrasound device for bone status assessment</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Ultrasound Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>20</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1219-28</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11758027</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcaneus/*ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Spontaneous/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Postmenopausal/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transducers,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11758027 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Chen, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grigorian, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saeed, I.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluation of a gel-coupled quantitative ultrasound device for bone status assessment</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Ultrasound Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>20</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1219-28</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11758027</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcaneus/*ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Spontaneous/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Postmenopausal/ultrasonography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transducers,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new gel-coupled calcaneal quantitative ultrasound system, Osteospace (Medilink, Montpellier, France), which was designed to assess the status of bone in the calcaneus. METHODS: The study group consisted of 215 healthy white women aged 20 to 85 years and 51 white women aged 60 to 86 years with osteoporotic fractures. Fifty-two healthy women aged 50 to 85 years were randomly selected from the healthy cohort as the control group. All the women had calcaneal quantitative ultrasonic measurements. The women with osteoporotic fractures and the control group also had proximal femur and lumbar anteroposterior spine bone mineral density measurements using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Bone mineral density was also measured in a subgroup of 54 women at the calcaneus. RESULTS: There was a significant inverse correlation of broadband ultrasound attenuation and speed of sound with age (P &lt; .001). Short-term measurement precision values expressed as coefficients of variation were 1.72% for broadband ultrasound attenuation and 0.64% for speed of sound, and standardized short-term precision values were 6.09% for broadband ultrasound attenuation and 3.87% for speed of sound. The correlations between the quantitative ultrasonic parameters and calcaneal bone mineral density were 0.69 (P = .0001) for broadband ultrasound attenuation and 0.45 (P = .0008) for speed of sound. Both quantitative ultrasonic parameters and all bone mineral density measurements of the hip and spine differed significantly between the control and osteoporotic fracture groups (P &lt; .01). Age-, weight-, and height-adjusted odds ratios per SD decrease were as follows: broadband ultrasound attenuation, 1.79; speed of sound, 1.83; spine bone mineral density, 2.34; femoral neck bone mineral density, 1.69; and total hip bone mineral density, 1.85. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density measurements were close, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: This new quantitative ultrasound system can detect age- and menopause-related influences on skeletal status and can discriminate healthy women from those with osteoporotic fractures in a manner comparable with that of bone mineral density measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES>0278-4297Evaluation StudiesJournal Article</NOTES>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11758027 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Pawluczyk, O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>28</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>438-44</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11339739</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Photons,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Rays</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11339739</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Guo, Y. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Martin, L. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hanna, W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Banerjee, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miller, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Khokha, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>10</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>243-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11303594</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Biopsy,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Needle,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*pathology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Culture</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Techniques,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diagnosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Differential,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Extracellular</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Matrix</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Proteins/analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Immunohistochemistry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Insulin-Like</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Growth</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factor</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>I/*analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11303594 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Tlsty, T. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hein, P. W.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Know thy neighbor: stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Curr Opin Genet Dev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>54-9</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11163151</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinogens/toxicity,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cell</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transformation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplastic,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cell</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transformation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Viral,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Extracellular</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Matrix/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Matrix</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Metalloproteinases/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*etiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Oncogenes,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phenotype,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Signal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transduction,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Stromal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cells/meta</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11163151</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hui, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Standardization of bone mineral density at femoral neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>12</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>438-44</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11446558</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variance,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/instrumentation/*standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Femur</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neck/physiopathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Postmenopause/physiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reference</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Standards</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11446558</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Tlsty, T. D.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Semin Cancer Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>97-104</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11322829</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Animals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Male,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>therapy/metabolism/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Signal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Transduction/*physiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Stromal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cells/*physiology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11322829 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gail, M. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Costantino, J. P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>93</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>334-5</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11238688</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/ethnology/genetics,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>in</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Situ/epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ductal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Odds</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ratio,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Predictive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Value</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tests,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk,</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11238688 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Rockhill, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Spiegelman, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byrne, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hunter, D. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Colditz, G. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2001</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>93</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>358-66</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11238697</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Anticarcinogenic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents/*therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>therapy/*epidemiology/etiology/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>European</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Continental</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ancestry</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Group/statistics</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>numerical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Odds</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ra</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11238697 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Stefanoyiannis, A. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Costaridou, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sakellaropoulos, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Panayiotakis, G.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A digital density equalization technique to improve visualization of breast periphery in mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Br J Radiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>73</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>410-20.</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Terminology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Vachon, C. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kuni, C. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Anderson, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Anderson, V. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sellers, T. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States)</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Causes Control</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>653-62</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>10977110</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variance,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Constitution,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/pathology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cross-Sectional</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hormone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Replacement</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Therapy,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Interviews,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Life</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Style,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mam</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=10977110 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Swarnakar, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H.K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Mammographic Density Reading Service for Clinical Drug Trials</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>RSNA 2000</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Chicago, IL</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PAGES>701</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Swarnakar, V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Mammographic Density Reading Service for Clinical Drug Trials</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Chicago, IL</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PAGES>701</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Mandelson, M. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Oestreicher, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Porter, P. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>White, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Finder, C. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Taplin, S. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>White, E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>92</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1081-7</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>10880551</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/pathology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Health</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Maintenance</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Organizations,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Odds</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Ratio,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Predictive</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Value</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Test</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=10880551 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Diessel, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gonzalez, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Carew, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Looker, A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparison of two phantoms for body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Ann N Y Acad Sci</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>904</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>107-10</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>amp,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aluminum,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Composition,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Weight,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods/standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Phantoms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Polyvinyl</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Chloride,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Quality</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Chow, C. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Venzon, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jones, E. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Premkumar, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O'Shaughnessy, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Zujewski, J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>917-21</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11008909</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Anticarcinogenic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents/pharmacology/therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antineoplastic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents/pharmacology/therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>therapy/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>in</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Situ/drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>therapy/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Infiltr</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11008909</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lele, S. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Graves, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gatalica, Z.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Immunohistochemical detection of maspin is a useful adjunct in distinguishing radial sclerosing lesion from tubular carcinoma of the breast</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>8</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>32-6</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>10937046</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=10937046</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Njeh, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cheng, X.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Toschke, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Osteoporosis Diagnostic Comparison of Six Forearm Bone Densitometers</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Submitted to the J. Bone and Miner. Research in the Fall of 2000.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brisson, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brisson, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cote, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Maunsell, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Berube, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Robert, J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>911-5</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>11008908</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Double-Blind</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Method,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Linear</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Logistic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Multivariate</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Selective</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Recepto</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=11008908 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Li, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wu, C. Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: A new method for clinical assessment</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Clin Densitom</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>3</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>281-90.</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brismar, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>von Scheven, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2000</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Whole-Body Bone Mineral Apparent Density (WBMAD) - Introduction of a New Variable for Evaluation of Paediatric Skeletal Status</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporosis International</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>S18</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Salzmann, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Phillips, K. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cauley, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Jama</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>282</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2156-63</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/epidemiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>amp,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>in</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Situ/epidemiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>amp,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carcinoma,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Infiltrating</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Duct/epidemiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>amp,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cost-Benefit</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gruner, S. M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comment on &quot;A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors&quot; [Med. Phys. 26, 905-916 (1999)] [letter]</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Med Phys</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>26</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2706</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Fluorescence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Monte</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Carlo</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Method,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiography/*instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Film</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Greendale, G. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Reboussin, B. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sie, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Singh, H. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Olson, L. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gatewood, O.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bassett, L. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wasilauskas, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bush, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Barrett-Connor, E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Ann Intern Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>130</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>262-9</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/chemically</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>induced,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confounding</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>(Epidemiology),</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Double-Blind</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Method,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Replacement</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Therapy/*adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogens,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Conjugated/adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects/*pharmacology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Longitudinal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*M</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Highnam, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brady, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic Image Analysis</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Dordrecht</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Kluwer</PUBLISHER>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Atkinson, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Warren, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bingham, S. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Day, N. E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen [In Process Citation]</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>8</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>863-6</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Son, H. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Oh, K. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Significance of follow-up mammography in estimating the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who have undergone surgery</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>AJR Am J Roentgenol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>173</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>905-9</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>10511146</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Antineoplastic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Agents,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hormonal/*therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>therapy/*radiography/surgery,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Follow-Up</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tamoxifen/*therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=10511146 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Blake,G.M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wahner, H.W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fogelman, I.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The evaluation of osteoporosis: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and ultrasound in clinical practice</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>London</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Martin Dunitz</PUBLISHER>
	<EDITION>2nd</EDITION>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Eckert, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Krueger, K. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grady, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Powles, T. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cauley, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Norton, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nickelsen, T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bjarnason, N. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Morrow, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lippman, M. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Black, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Glusman, J. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Costa, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jordan, V. C.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1999</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Jama</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>281</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2189-97</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>10376571</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/metabolism,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Double-Blind</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Method,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Endometrial</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Antagonists/adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects/*therapeutic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>use,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogens/*agonists,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Follow-Up</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Postmenopausal/*drug</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>the</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=10376571 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kelly, T. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A quality control phantom for DXA body composition measurements</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Lindsey, R.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>Meunier, P. J.</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Delavan, WI</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Osteoporosis International</PUBLISHER>
	<VOLUME>8</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>524</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Hologic</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lucas, F. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cauley, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Stone, R. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Vogt, M. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Weissfeld, J. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kuller, L. H.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Bone mineral density and risk of breast cancer: differences by family history of breast cancer. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>148</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>22-9</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variance,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/*genetics,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cohort</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Replacement</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Therapy/*adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radius/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Regression</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Suppor</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Breitenstein, D. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shaw, C. C.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparison of three tissue composition measurement techniques using digital mammograms--a signal-to-noise study</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Digit Imaging</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>137-50</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9718504</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/pathology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9718504 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Highnam, R. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brady, J. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepstone, B. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Estimation of compressed breast thickness during mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Br J Radiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>71</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>646-53</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9849389</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dosage,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reference</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Values,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Research</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9849389 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Hayward, S. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grossfeld, G. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tlsty, T. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cunha, G. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Genetic and epigenetic influences in prostatic carcinogenesis (review)</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Int J Oncol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>13</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>35-47</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9625801</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Animals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Gene</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Expression</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Regulation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplastic,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Male,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prostatic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*genetics</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9625801 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR></AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Reston, VA</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>American College of Radiology (ACR)</PUBLISHER>
	<EDITION>Third</EDITION>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>J. A. Shepherd</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>M. Jablonski</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Metal Implants</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>I. Fogelman</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>The evaluation of Osteoporosis</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>London</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Martin Dunitz</PUBLISHER>
	<EDITION>2nd</EDITION>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lockwood, G. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tritchler, D. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>7</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1133-1144</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>van Gils, C. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Otten, J. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Verbeek, A. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hendriks, J. H.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Eur J Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>14</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>315-20</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bias</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>(Epidemiology),</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Confidence</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Intervals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Logistic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*statistics</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>numerical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening/*</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Kerlikowske, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grady, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Barclay, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Frankel, S. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ominsky, S. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sickles, E. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ernster, V.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1998</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>90</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1801-9</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9839520</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/pathology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diagnosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Differential,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Observer</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Societies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Medical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>United</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>States</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9839520</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Barna, S. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tate, M. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wixted, R. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Eikenberry, E. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gruner, S. M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Characteristics of a prototype pixel array detector (PAD) for use in microsecond framing time-resolved x-ray diffraction studies</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>44</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>950-956</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ye, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mathur, A. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hui, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparative calibration without a gold standard</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Stat Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>16</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1889-905</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Absorptiometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Photon/*instrumentation/*statistics</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>numerical</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Algorithms,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density/*physiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Likelihood</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Functions,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporo</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Cowen, A. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Parkin, G. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hawkridge, P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Direct digital mammography image acquisition</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Eur Radiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>7</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>918-30</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9228110</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/instrumentation/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhancement/instrumentation/*methods</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9228110 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Robinson, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O?Gara, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Spector, T.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Decubitus lateral vertebral imaging and morphometric analysis using a fan beam absorptiometer</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Cincinnati, Ohio</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>4500,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>QDR,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>works</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Elvins, D. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ring, E. F. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hueting, J. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Stott, J. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Steiger, P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Precision study of DXA THR Metal Exclusion</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporosis International</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>7</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>287</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>qdr-4500,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>metal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>removal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>prosthetic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>hip,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>hologic</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Jablonski, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gorzelak, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Precision of bone density measurement around total hip replacements</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Ronne, Bornholm, Denmark</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>metal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>removal,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>qdr-4500,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>tha,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>prosthetic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>hip</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Critten, J. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>203</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>564-8</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Signal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Sternlicht, M. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kedeshian, P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shao, Z. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Safarians, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Barsky, S. H.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1997</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The human myoepithelial cell is a natural tumor suppressor</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Clin Cancer Res</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>3</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1949-58</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>9815584</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=9815584</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gruner, S. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tate, M. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tecotzky, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Study of Afterglow in X-ray Phosphors for Use on Fast-framing CCD Detectors</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Submitted to the Journal of Optical Engineering. December, 1996.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>M. B. Williams</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>J. A. Shepherd</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>R. H. Kretsinger</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Analysis of Trade-Offs Between Spatial Resolution and Detective Area in Crystallographic Detectors for Use with Large-Unit-Cell Crystals</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of Applied Crystallography</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>29</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>717</PAGES>
	<ABSTRACT>Calculations show that, over a large range of cell size, Bragg resolution and X-ray beam width, a single 92 mm diameter micro-channel-plate (MCP) detector outperforms an array of four 256 x 256 mm multiwire proportional chambers. The advantage of the MCP detector are gretest at large cell size, high Bragg resolution and small beam width.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kretsinger, R. H.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Analysis of trade-offs between spatial resolution and detective area in crystallographic detectors for use with large-unit cell crystals</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of Applied Crystallography</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>29</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>717-26</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Microchannel</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>plates,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Multiwire</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>proportional</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>chambers,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-ray</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>crystallography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-ray</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>detection,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Spatial</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>resolution,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Detective</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>area,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Crystallographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>detectors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Large</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>unit</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>cell</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>crystals,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Efficient</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>acquisition,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>ray</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>crystallographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>data,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Photon</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>counting</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>d</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>Efficient acquisition of X-ray crystallographic data from crystals with one or more large unit-cell dimensions requires simultaneous resolution of many reflections that are tightly packed in reciprocal space. This optimization requires careful matching of detector and beam characteristics, including detector area and spatial resolution, beam intensity and beam size. Two types of photon-counting detectors have been developed at the University of Virginia for use with rotating-anode X-ray sources. One is a flat gas-filled multiwire proportional chamber (MWPC) with delay line read-out and the other uses a solid X-ray absorber and contains microchannel plates (MCPs) with a delay line read-out. The MCP detector has significantly better resolution than the MWPCs but has a smaller sensitive area. As an example of a methodology for comparing the relative acquisition efficiencies of detectors used with rotating-anode X-ray sources, the relative capabilities of these two detectors are calculated. The comparison is made over a range of unit-cell sizes, Bragg resolutions and crystal sizes, taking into account the intensities of the X-ray beams that optimize each detector's performance for a given set of crystal parameters.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES>ArticleMunksgaard International Booksellers & Publishers</NOTES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Cauley, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lucas, F. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Kuller, L. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Vogt, M. T.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Browner, W. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Bone mineral density and risk of breast cancer in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group [see comments]</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Jama</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>276</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1404-8</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Absorptiometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Photon,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*EPIDEMIOLOGY,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calcaneus,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Follow-Up</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fractures,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hip,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Multivariate</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Osteoporosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Proportional</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hazards</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prospective</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radius,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>R</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Ursin, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Pike, M. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Spicer, D. V.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Porrath, SA</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Reitherman, RW</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Can mammographic densities predict effects of Tamoxifen on the breast?</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of the National Cancer Institute</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>88</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>129</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Laskey, M. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Nutrition</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>12</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>45-51</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Composition,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/STATISTICS</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>NUMER</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>DATA,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dosage,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Sensitivity</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Specificity</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mathur, A. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Blunt, B. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gluer, C. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Will, A. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fuerst, T. P.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jergas, M. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Andriano, K. N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Bone Miner Res</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>626-37</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods/standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reference</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Pietrobelli, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Formica, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wang, Z.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Heymsfield, S. B.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Physiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>271</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>E941-51</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Composition,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*METHODS,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Graham, S. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Bronskill, M. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Br J Cancer</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>73</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>162-8</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>8546901</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=8546901</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Little, L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lockwood, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jong, R. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1996</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Eur J Cancer Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>5</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>319-27</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>8972250</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=8972250</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gluer, C. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Blake, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lu, Y.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Blunt, B. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jergas, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>5</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>262-70</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density/*PHYSIOLOGY,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/METHODS/*STANDARDS,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tecotzky, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gruner, S. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tate, M. W.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A study of persistence in gadolinium oxysulfide x-ray phosphors</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>SPIE 2519: X-Ray and Ultraviolet Sensors and Applications</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PAGES>24-30</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>GOS,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>after-glow</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>S. L. Barna</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>S. M. Gruner</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>J. A. Shepherd</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>R.L.Wixted,</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Development of a Fast Pixel Array Detector for Use in Microsecond Time-Resolved X-Ray Diffraction</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>S.P.I.E.2521: Time Resolved Electron and X-ray Diffraction</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PAGES>301-309</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Laya, MB</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gallagher, JC</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Schreiman, JS</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Larson, EB</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Watson, P</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Weinstein, L</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Effect of postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy on mammographic density and parenchymal pattern</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>196</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>433-437</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Byrne, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Schairer, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wolfe, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Parekh, N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Salane, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brinton, L. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hoover, R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Haile, R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>87</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1622-9</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Menopause,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Time</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>United</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>States</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jong, R. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Little, L. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miller, A. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lockwood, G. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tritchler, D. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>87</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>670-5</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*cytology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Canada,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Processing,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Computer-Assisted,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Time</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fa</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H.K.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Grampp, S.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gluer, C.C.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Faulkner, K.G.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jergas, M.J.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Engelke, K.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hagiwara, S.,</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Van Kuijk, C.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1995</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibrations results</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of Bone & Mineral Research</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1503-1514</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>DXA,,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Spine,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Hologic,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>QDR-2000,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cross</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brenner, R. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Breast MR imaging. An analysis of its role with respect to other imaging and interventional modalities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>2</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>705-23</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>7489318</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Implants,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*diagnosis/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Contrast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Media,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Costs</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cost</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Magnetic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Resonance</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Imaging/economics/methods/standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/economics/me</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=7489318 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Schor, A. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rushton, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ferguson, J. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Howell, A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Redford, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Schor, S. L.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Phenotypic heterogeneity in breast fibroblasts: functional anomaly in fibroblasts from histologically normal tissue adjacent to carcinoma</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Int J Cancer</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>59</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>25-32</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>7927899</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=7927899</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Wahner, H.W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fogelman, I.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The Evaluation of Osteoporosis:  Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>London</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Martin Dunitz</PUBLISHER>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, JW</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, NF</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>John, RA</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, MJ</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>39</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1629-1638</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Byng, J. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jong, R. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Yaffe, M. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Phys Med Biol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>39</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1629-38</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>15551535</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*classification/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cohort</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Comparative</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Study,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>X-Ray/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Observer</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Pattern</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Recognition,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Automated/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiographic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Image</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Enhan</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=15551535 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gail, M. H.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Benichou, J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1994</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Validation studies on a model for breast cancer risk</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Natl Cancer Inst</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>86</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>573-5</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>8179704</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Biometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Statistical,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>National</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Institutes</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Health</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>(U.S.),</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>United</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>States/epidemiology</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=8179704 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>31</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Phillips, W.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
		<SECONDARY_AUTHOR>John, Shepherd</SECONDARY_AUTHOR>
	</SECONDARY_AUTHORS>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>fiber</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>optic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>substrate</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<NOTES>(03) Brandeis Univ.</NOTES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A. Sobottka S. E. Williams M. B.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Design and performance of a novel powder flash evaporator</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J. Vac. Sci. Technol.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>A11</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1451-1453</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A. Sobottka S. E. Williams M. B.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Performance and fabrication of thin film NaI(Tl) scintillators for use on imaging photomultiplier tubes</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>40</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>413-416</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Properties of 100-mm X 100-mm triple stacks of microchannel plates used in a sealed detector for x-ray crystallography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>SPIE: X-ray detector physics and applications II</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>2009</VOLUME>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>NaI(Tl),</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>scintillator</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Gluer, C. C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Faulkner, K. G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Estilo, M. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Engelke, K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosin, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Genant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact [see comments]</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Osteoporos Int</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>3</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>227-35</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>*Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Calibration,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cross-Sectional</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Longitudinal</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Observer</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Variation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Quality</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Reproducibility</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Results,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1993</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Thin film NaI(Tl) films for large-area high spatial-resolution imaging of x-rays</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>SPIE: X-ray Detector Physics and Applications</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>2009</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>109-120</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>scintillator</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Meng, XL</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rosenthal, R</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Rubin, DB</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1992</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Comparing Correlated Correlation Coefficients</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Psychological Bulletin</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>111</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>172-175</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Warner, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Lockwood, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Tritchler, D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1992</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer Detect Prev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>16</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>67-72</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>1532349</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/anatomy</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>histology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*epidemiology/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Case-Control</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cohort</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fibrocystic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Disease/classification/*epidemiology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Meta-Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prevalence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=1532349 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1991</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Delay Line Readout of Microchannel plates in a Prototype Position-Sensitive Photomultiplier Tube</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>A302</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>105-112</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Cummings, S. R.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1991</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluating the benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>91</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>14S-18S</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Bone</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Density/DRUG</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>EFFECTS,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Coronary</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Disease/*PREVENTION</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>CONTROL,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Densitometry,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Estrogen</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Replacement</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Therapy/*ADVERSE</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>EFFECTS,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Evaluation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Studies,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/CHEMICALLY</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>INDUCED,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1991</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Evaluation of an Imaging Phototube Using Microchannel Plates with Delay Line Readout</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>38</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>158-173</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sobottka, S. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Williams, M. B.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1991</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Imaging Properties of a Delay Line Readout Using Large Microchannel Plates</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>38</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>154-157</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brenner, R. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1990</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Screening mammography. Medical legal considerations</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>66</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1348-50</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>2205364</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Jurisprudence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/standards,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening/*legislation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>jurisprudence,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>United</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>States</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=2205364 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Peters, R. D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1989</YEAR>
	<TITLE>A Pendulum with Adjustable Trends in the Period</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>American Journal of Physics</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>57</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>535-539</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Saftlas, A. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Wolfe, J. N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hoover, R. N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Brinton, L. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Schairer, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Salane, M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Szklo, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1989</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>129</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>518-26</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>2916545</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Body</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Weight,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/genetics/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mass</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Screening,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=2916545</URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1988</YEAR>
	<TITLE>An Inexpensive BCD counter Interface for the TRS-80 Color Computer II</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Journal of Undergraduate Research in Physics</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>VI</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>39-42</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Goodwin, P. J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1988</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>127</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1097-108</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/etiology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Epidemiologic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fibrocystic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Disease</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Precancerous</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Conditions/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Saftlas, A. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Szklo, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1987</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Epidemiol Rev</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>9</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>146-74</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/pathology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Wolfe, J. N.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saftlas, A. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Salane, M.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1987</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>AJR Am J Roentgenol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>148</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1087-92</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>80</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>and</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>over,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Epidemiologic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fibrocystic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Disease</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Boyd, N. F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>O'Sullivan, B.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Campbell, J. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Fishell, E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Simor, I.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cooke, G.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Germanson, T.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1982</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic signs as risk factors for breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Br J Cancer</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>45</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>185-93</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/pathology/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Fibrocystic</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Disease</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>of</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/pathology/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brisson, J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Merletti, F.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Sadowsky, N. L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Twaddle, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Morrison, A. S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Cole, P.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1982</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Epidemiol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>115</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>428-37</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diseases/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Non-U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Xeromammography</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Brenner, R. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1982</YEAR>
	<TITLE>X-ray mammography and diaphanography in screening for breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>J Reprod Med</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>27</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>679-84</PAGES>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>6818342</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diseases/diagnosis/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Cost-Benefit</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Analysis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dose-Response</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Relationship,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Radiation,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Humans,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Aged,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Transillumination</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<URL>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=PubMed&amp;dopt=Citation&amp;list_uids=6818342 </URL>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Hammerstein, G. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Miller, D. W.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>White, D. R.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Masterson, M. E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Woodard, H. Q.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Laughlin, J. S.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1979</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Absorbed radiation dose in mammography</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Radiology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>130</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>485-91</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adipose</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Tissue/radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/*radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Mammography/adverse</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mathematics,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Models,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Structural,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dosage,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Risk,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Skin/radiation</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>effects,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Support,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>U.S.</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Gov,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>',</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>t,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>P.H.S.,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Thermoluminescent</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Dosimet</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Wolfe, J. N.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1976</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Am J Roentgenol</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>126</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>1130-7</PAGES>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Adult,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Factors,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast/pathology,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Diseases/radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Breast</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Neoplasms/pathology/prevention</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>&,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD></KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>control/*radiography,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Female,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Human,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Mammography/*methods,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Middle</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Age,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Probability,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Prognosis,</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>*Risk</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Wolfe, J. N.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1976</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammogrpahic parenchymal pattern</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Cancer</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME>37</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>2486-2492</PAGES>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>7</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Shewhart, W.A.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>1939</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Statistical Method from the viewpoint of quality control</TITLE>
	<PLACE_PUBLISHED>Washington DC</PLACE_PUBLISHED>
	<PUBLISHER>Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture</PUBLISHER>
</RECORD>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Prevrhal, S.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Shepherd, J. A.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Klifa, C.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Gennant, H. K.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Mihalko, W. M.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Saleh, K. J.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<TITLE>Computer-assisted technique to delineate osteolytic lesions around the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Submitted to Clin. Ortho. and Rel. Resh. 2006.</SECONDARY_TITLE>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>